Saturday, November 03, 2007

Misunderstanding the Cavs

A recent caller to a WTAM sports talk show let his feelings toward this town's sports teams be known, loud and clear:

"Go Browns, go Indians and screw LeBron."

Mike Trivisonno has called LeBron James an idiot on the air. Esquire writer Scott Raab, a native Clevelander, has gone so far as to call him "worthless scum."

How far the mighty have fallen. A year ago, the entire region of Northeast Ohio might have donated their paychecks if it meant keeping LeBron in Cleveland. Now, after the unforgivable sin of wearing a Yankees cap to an Indians-Yankees playoff game, LeBron can apparently just pack his bags for New York right now. There are some in Cleveland that want no part of him anymore.

The fact that LeBron is the best thing that has ever happened to Cleveland basketball has taken a backseat to the fact that he roots for the wrong baseball team. If ever there was a red-flag indicator of where the Cavs stand in the pecking order of Cleveland sports, that was it. Lift the Cavs to the Finals, great. But side against the Browns or Indians, you're no friend of ours.

If that was worst criticism facing the Cavs, it would be bad enough. But the Cavs as an organization are getting similar negative treatment just about everywhere they turn.

The national media views their conference title as the mother of all flukes, a product of a weak conference, favorable playoff seeding and a Pistons team that was caught napping. On top of that, they've raked the Cavs over the coals for not making any moves of note this offseason, and failing to come to terms with Anderson Varejao and, until recently, Sasha Pavlovic.

It wouldn't be such a bitter pill to swallow if the national media wasn't stumbling over themselves to proclaim the revamped Celtics of Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen the new top dog in the East before they even played a dribble of basketball together. But the situation is made even worse by the fact that many Cavs fans are also dragging the name of their own team through the mud.

The Cavs are possibly the most negatively-perceived defending conference champion in NBA history. No one thinks they deserved to go as far as they did last year. No one outside of Cleveland wants to see them go that far again this year, and no one in Cleveland seems to think they have much of a shot.

For the national yakkers and scribes, maybe it has something to do with not wanting to spend June (or any other month of the year, for that matter) in Cleveland again. Cleveland is a rust-belt wasteland to East Cost elitists. I've accepted that. But when local fans and media members, or people who profess to being long-suffering Cleveland fans, start doing things like openly rooting for LeBron to take his Yankees cap and get out of here, I find it troubling.

Despite the fact that LeBron has helped set a franchise record with four playoff series wins in the span of two years, despite the fact that Danny Ferry has cut-and-pasted together a conference championship club out of a team that has had no draft picks in 2005 and '07, and a long history of draft failure before that, despite the fact that Mike Brown took an average team and made them borderline-great with a defense-first philosophy that was utterly foreign when he took over, all we hear are harrumphs over what the team's trio of leaders hasn't been able to do.

There is always friction when the financial realities of professional sports teams meet the championship expectations of their fans. All Cavs fans see is that Boston added two star players, Detroit and Chicago fortified their rosters through the draft and the Bulls have been connected to Kobe Bryant through trade rumors. The Cavs, meanwhile, have been as silent as a mausoleum all summer and still don't have their best bench player in the fold.

Ferry has been verbally shredded by local fans in much the same way Indians GM Mark Shapiro was as the Indians slogged through their rebuilding phase. The common feeling seems to be that Ferry is asleep at the switch, or is obliviously standing by, watching the rest of the East teams improve themselves in much the same way Nero supposedly played a fiddle as Rome burned.

The argument that Ferry backed himself into his own corner with his underproductive free agent class of '05 holds some validity. You can grill Ferry for spending owner Dan Gilbert's money in such a stupid fashion if you want, but what it really underscores is that free agency is a bad way to build a team. The way the NBA's collective bargaining agreement is set up, teams almost always have to overpay to get a veteran free agent to switch teams. The lone few execptions occur when a proven winning team can get an aging veteran to sign on for well below his market value in exchange for a shot at a title.

In the summer of '05, the Cavs had no draft picks thanks to Jim Paxson signing away the rights to the team's first-round pick as a condition of disastrous Jiri Welsch deal -- which actually cost the Cavs two first-rounders in the end. They were coming off a March and April collapse that ended with a narrow playoff miss. Ferry needed to improve the team, re-affirm LeBron's faith in the organization, and the $22 million in cap space he had to work with was the only way he could do it.

This summer, possibly with the lessons of '05 learned, Ferry made up his mind that he wouldn't overpay for role players again, resulting in a frustrating offseason for fans that wanted to see the team improve upon itself after making the NBA Finals for the first time ever.

Not having draft picks is the real killer, however. Even with the Cavs' frequent draft misfires (Shannon Brown is apparently the latest), the only way for an NBA team to add to its roster yearly and still maintain long-term financial flexibility is through the draft. The Cavs are finally out from under all their trade obligations, and starting next summer, they'll once again have two draft picks. Ferry would also be smart to add picks whenever possible.

On the coaching front, Mike Brown is once again being chastised for his seemingly-lacking offensive game plan. Obviously, offense isn't his strong suit, but if you're calling for Brown to be fired, you haven't been paying attention to how NBA teams make it to June.

Why have the Spurs and Pistons won titles, while the Suns, Mavericks and Warriors haven't? The former two teams play defense at a high level. It is a law of nature every spring once the playoffs start: teams with superior defense beat teams with inferior defense.

The Cavs made the NBA Finals last spring for two reasons: LeBron James and Mike Brown's constant harping on defense. No other reason. No other individual performances, outside of Daniel Gibson's uprising in Game 6 against Detroit, contributed to the Cavs' conference title run in a standout way.

It shows that a flawed roster can, to borrow a used phrase, "rise up" when taught the right things. Brown, for all of his questionable offensive moves, did the right things to get this team to the Finals. By any measure, he did a good job as this team's coach last year.

The Cavs definitely have a ways to go before they are capable of making consistent runs deep into May and into June, but no one seems to want to give them the credit for the ground they've already covered. This is a good basketball organization controlled by guys who have the right idea. But things don't always turn out picture-perfect at first.

Living in Cleveland, you should know that bumps in the road are part of the terrain. If your resident basketball superstar's biggest sin is wearing a Yankees hat to a Yankees-Indians playoff game, count your blessings, not the days until he's a free agent.

4 comments:

Esquire's said...

I understand your reaction to my reaction to LeBron's cap. But let me to try to illuminate mine.

I'll assume that you remember the days when Larry Bird was a young Celtic and the toast of Boston.

Let's say that Bird came to Fenway wearing a Yankees cap for the opener of a playoff series against the Yankees. And let's say that Bird had been interviewed during that game on national TV and had talked about what a big Yanks fan he was.

If Bird had done such a thing, I have zero doubt that Bird and the Celtics would've immediately tried to control and repair the resulting damage. Nobody involved in pro sports in Boston would have wasted time arguing about whether or not this was a big deal; they would have been smart enough to know that something like that could profoundly affect the rest of Bird's Boston career and the future of the Celtic franchise.

We'll never know, of course, because such a thing NEVER would've happened. Bird wasn't that stupid. Or rude. Or careless. Or disrespectful.

And Bird's just one example. If a Jet, Giant, Ranger, or Knick wore a Red Sox cap to Yankee Stadium, etc., regardless of his stature, he'd be run out of town.

Now add the fact that King James is a native -- someone who knows full well that he's flipping off the fans who pay to see him work. Does that make it better or worse?

Only in Cleveland would a scumbag like LeBron James have decent guys like you pleading for him. Only Cleveland fans are so needy, so desperate, so eager to forgive and willing to be shit on. Sad.

You know the worst part? The worst part is that if you weren't blinded by his skills and your craving to feel better because you root for a championship team , you'd see the cap as just one more piece of evidence that James will leave Cleveland as soon as his current extension runs out.

Gone, and happy to be gone. You doubt it? How much are you willing to bet?

Erik said...

"Only in Cleveland would a scumbag like LeBron James have decent guys like you pleading for him. Only Cleveland fans are so needy, so desperate, so eager to forgive and willing to be shit on. Sad."

I think Cleveland's championship total in the past 43 years explains that. We're needy, desperate and eager to forgive because we want to win a championship really, really badly.

This is a city that defended Albert Belle and, to a lesser extent, Milton Bradley. If LeBron is a turncoat scumbag, I shudder to think what those guys are.

Anonymous said...

This whole Lebron cap controversy is blown way out of proportion. He's always said he's a Yankee fan, its not as if he switched recently as a big "FU" to Cleveland. He's also a Dallas Cowboys fan, he grew up when those teams were winning, so naturally he gravitated to those teams. Also, he's not from Cleveland, he's from Akron, so he's not technically a "native". Cincinnati teams could also say he's a scumbag for not being a fan of their teams.

Yes, it was stupid the way he handled it, he could have been a little more subtle, but he's only 22 years old. Everyone one does stupid things when you're young.

Lastly, I think most Cavs fan realize how lucky we are to have Lebron, and how bad it would be if he did leave, but I like to think, if the Cavs can win championships, he would stay, but if the Cavs management can't build a good team around him, I don't blame he one bit for wanting to leave.

Go Cavs.

Rob said...

Who cares about Scott Raab. Only a very small group of people cared about this. They just happened to receive a lot of media attention.

- LeBron is a once-in-a-generation player. He's one of the best in if not THE best, in the entire game. He's better than anyone in basketball history at his age. He'll probably be the best athlete this city ever sees
- He's from Akron and represents the city damn well I have to say. As an Akronite, that means something.
- He plays for Cleveland and will likely deliver at least one championship if he stays with the Cavs (and they put somebody around him).

But he wore a Yankees cap to a Indians game? It was silly, but we're gonna start hating on this kid because of it. Gimme a break.

With all due respect, nobody cares what people like Scott freakin' Raab have to say. LeBron is OUR guy playing for OUR team. No way would real fans go off the deep end for one little mistake.

Thank God Cleveland fans aren't like this dude.