Dion Waiters is the widget of the Cavs roster. If he were a
mechanical device, he’d have a lot of lights and buttons that indicate he can
do many different things. But he didn’t come with any type of instruction
sheet, so you’re left to randomly press buttons, hoping to find the sequence
that powers him up.
What can he do? Does he fit your needs? If so, where? All
legitimate questions that don’t really have any solid answers through the first
100 or so games of Waiters’ professional career.
He came off the bench in his two years at Syracuse. The Cavs
drafted him fourth overall in 2012 because, despite the fact that he was
relegated to a sixth-man role, his scoring talent was apparent. Perhaps
envisioning a better version of the Mo Williams and Delonte West backcourt that
helped power the Cavs to 66 and 61 wins seasons in LeBron’s final two years
here, the Cavs wanted to pair Waiters with Kyrie Irving in the starting
backcourt.
Much like Williams and West, Irving and Waiters were both a tad
undersized, but both could create their own shots, and both are adept passers.
A backcourt comprised of a pair of point guard/shooting hybrids could be very
versatile and very dangerous.
But there is only one ball. Only one player can create the
shot per possession. Kyrie, being the anointed franchise player, would
essentially get the right of first refusal, forcing Waiters to play off the
ball.
It didn’t really work. Waiters never seemed comfortable
taking kickout passes, curling off screens, and all of the other
catch-and-shoot rhythm play that is expected of a shooting guard. Last year, he
finished second among rookies in scoring behind Rookie of the Year Damian
Lillard, but his 14.7 PPG came on 13.4 often poorly-selected shots per game. He
converted 41 percent of his shots as a rookie, but most of his converted shots
were around the basket. He shot 31 percent from three-point range, exhibiting
no ability to stretch the floor – a must-have skill for any starting shooting
guard in the NBA.
This season didn’t begin much better. As the Cavs careened
to a 4-12 start, Waiters continued to struggle in his starting role. Then the
rumors started. He reportedly wanted out of Cleveland. He allegedly accused
Kyrie and Tristan Thompson of playing “buddy ball” with each other, leaving him
comparatively starved for touches and shots.
But as Mike Brown spent November searching frantically for
anything that would stop the bleeding, one of the moves he made was perhaps one
that was a year in the making: He shuffled the starting lineup. C.J. Miles
became the starting shooting guard, and Waiters moved to the same sixth-man
bench role that made him a top-five draft pick at Syracuse.
So determined was Brown to keep Waiters in that role that
when Miles went down with a calf injury, Matthew Dellavedova – who will never
be confused with an actual starting shooting guard – started in his place.
Waiters reportedly wasn’t happy with the move – who wants to
lose their starting gig? – but since moving to the bench, the progress has been
palpable. Since Nov. 27, Waiters has notched five 20-point games and a 30-point
game. There have still been a few clunked in the mix (1/10 FG and 3 PTS versus
the Clippers), but the good games have outpaced the bad games.
Waiters is playing with more confidence, even swagger at
times. But even as Waiters starts to show signs of developing into a productive
player, there are still a circus’ worth of elephants in the room.
Did the Cavs really burn a No. 4 pick on a guy who was
destined for a bench role? If Waiters needs the ball and Kyrie needs the ball,
can they ever play together in the same backcourt and be successful? Even with
the renewal of hope spawned by his recent uptick in performance, will we simply
come to the conclusion that Waiters is a mismatched part in Cleveland, and
bound for the trading block?
It is an odd development to have a high level of redundant
scoring in the backcourt – Jarrett Jack can also chuck it – while small forward
languishes, occupied by the underwhelming trio of Alonzo Gee, Earl Clark and
Anthony Bennett. But scoring is scoring, no matter where it comes from. And
with a roster that appears to finally be stabilizing itself after a November of
horrendous turmoil and blowout losses, now might not be the time to answer the
questions regarding Waiters’ future in Cleveland.
If the players on this team can continue settling into their
roles, absorb Brown’s complicated defense well enough to execute it at a
reasonably high level and score enough points to win more than they lose, the
best course of action might be to let the Jell-O set for the remainder of this
season.
It’s a far cry from several weeks ago, when it looked like a
transformational trade was the only thing that might save the season.
Chris Grant will almost certainly address the small forward
position this coming summer, one way or another. And if the Cavs can sign or
trade for a quality scoring forward, Waiters’ presence as a bench scorer could
add first-string scoring punch to the second unit – a luxury that a lot of
teams don’t have.
A fan base like Cleveland’s, starved for a championship –
and recently, just starved for winning seasons and playoff appearances –
doesn’t want to hear about works in progress. Fans don’t want to hear
front-office buzzwords like “process” and “upside.” But that’s exactly what the
Cavs are. They’re a work in progress, and all the holes and roles won’t be
completely filled or defined this season. Even if the Cavs roar back to claim a
top-four seed in the weak Eastern Conference, all the questions won’t be
answered.
That includes how to best utilize the undefined widget that
is Waiters. Starting shooting guard? Backup combo guard? Trade bait? Those
questions will have to be answered at some point. But not right now.
No comments:
Post a Comment